(Indicative picture) – Photo: Social Media Detailed A new twist has come in the petition regarding Ujjain Mayor election. On an application by petitioner Mahesh Parmar, the court has issued directions that the DMM machine data regarding election results should be preserved till the final disposal of the petition. Please inform that in last July the elections for the post of Mayor of Ujjain Municipal Corporation were held. In this, BJP’s Mukesh Tatwal has been declared victorious. Congress candidate Mahesh Parmar has filed a petition regarding the results. Hearing this, District and Sessions Judge RK Vani has ordered the District Election Officer to preserve the DMM machine data related to election results till the final disposal of the petition. State Spokesperson Advocate Vivek Gupta told that Congress authorized candidate MLA Mahesh Parmar had filed an application in the court during the election petition. It was presented before the Election Commission that the data of the used machine is destroyed after the completion of 6 months of the election. Therefore, it should be preserved till the disposal of the petition. The District Court accepted the application of MLA Mahesh Parmar and passed this order on Thursday. Advocate Rasik Sugandhi appeared for the petitioner in the case. The next hearing has been fixed on 233 January. Significantly, in the first phase of the urban bodies elections held in different phases in Madhya Pradesh, on July 6 in Ujjain Voting took place. 17 His results came on July. One lakh 17 thousand to Mahesh Parmar of Congress for the post of mayor. got votes and Mahesh Parmar 1671546202 was defeated by votes. After this, there was an uproar at the counting venue and the Congress leaders and the administration came face to face. Mahesh Parmar had alleged that after first declaring victory, the results were changed to declare BJP candidate Mukesh Tatwal as the winner. After this, documentary evidence was presented in the petition filed in the court. Also, in the petition, there was a demand for re-counting under the supervision of the court. ,
Comments