supreme-court-seeks-report-from-delhi-police-on-hate-speech,-questions-raised-on-timing-of-registering-fir
New Delhi : The Supreme Court on Friday in the capital of India Delhi has sought a report from the Delhi Police in the matter of hate speeches given in religious gatherings. Along with this, the Supreme Court has also asked the Delhi Police why it took five months to register the FIR. How many people were arrested in this case. According to the news of the news agency Bhasha, the Supreme Court has sought a report from the police officer investigating the case, taking cognizance of no significant progress being made by the Delhi Police in the case of hate speech. According to the news of the news agency Bhasha, the Supreme Court During the hearing, it was stated that the incident pertains to December, and the FIR in the case was registered on May 4, last year 959 was registered on. The Supreme Court asked the Delhi Police that why do you need five months to file an FIR? How many arrests have been made? )Direction to file affidavit in two weeks According to the news, a bench of Chief Justice (CJI) DY Chandrachud and Justice PS Narasimha said that there has been no significant progress in the investigation. The bench directed Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj to file an affidavit regarding the progress made so far in the investigation within two weeks of the details being given by the Investigating Officer (IO) of Delhi Police. Uttarakhand and Delhi police accused of not taking actionA contempt file filed by Supreme Court activist Tushar Gandhi Was hearing the petition, in which Uttarakhand and Delhi Police have been accused of not taking any action in the case of so-called hate speeches. The bench gave the list of parties to the Uttarakhand government and the police chief in the contempt petition on November last year 17 was removed from The contempt petition was filed seeking punishment for the police chiefs of Delhi and Uttarakhand for their alleged inaction in violation of the Supreme Court's judgment in the Tehseen Poonawalla case. Supreme Court had given instructions on mob lynching The Supreme Court had laid down guidelines that mob lynching What action needs to be taken in hate crimes including mob lynching. Activist Tushar Gandhi in his petition has sought contempt action against senior police officers for not taking any action on the issue as per the guidelines laid down to prevent cases of hate speeches and lynching. have demanded. Allegations of spreading hatred in Dharma Sansad The petition states that immediately after the incidents Later the speeches were made available and were also in the public domain. Despite this, Uttarakhand Police and Delhi Police did not take action against those who gave these speeches. It is alleged in this petition that since December 45 at Haridwar till December, and 11 December, held in Delhi 'Religion Hate speeches were made in the Parliament.

You can share this post!

Related News

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

New Delhi : The Supreme Court on Friday in the capital of India Delhi has sought a report from the Delhi Police in the matter of hate speeches given in religious gatherings. Along with this, the Supreme Court has also asked the Delhi Police why it took five months to register the FIR. How many people were arrested in this case. According to the news of the news agency Bhasha, the Supreme Court has sought a report from the police officer investigating the case, taking cognizance of no significant progress being made by the Delhi Police in the case of hate speech.

According to the news of the news agency Bhasha, the Supreme Court During the hearing, it was stated that the incident pertains to December, and the FIR in the case was registered on May 4, last year 959 was registered on. The Supreme Court asked the Delhi Police that why do you need five months to file an FIR? How many arrests have been made?

)Direction to file affidavit in two weeks According to the news, a bench of Chief Justice (CJI) DY Chandrachud and Justice PS Narasimha said that there has been no significant progress in the investigation. The bench directed Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj to file an affidavit regarding the progress made so far in the investigation within two weeks of the details being given by the Investigating Officer (IO) of Delhi Police.

Uttarakhand and Delhi police accused of not taking actionA contempt file filed by Supreme Court activist Tushar Gandhi Was hearing the petition, in which Uttarakhand and Delhi Police have been accused of not taking any action in the case of so-called hate speeches. The bench gave the list of parties to the Uttarakhand government and the police chief in the contempt petition on November last year 17 was removed from The contempt petition was filed seeking punishment for the police chiefs of Delhi and Uttarakhand for their alleged inaction in violation of the Supreme Court’s judgment in the Tehseen Poonawalla case.

Supreme Court had given instructions on mob lynching

The Supreme Court had laid down guidelines that mob lynching What action needs to be taken in hate crimes including mob lynching. Activist Tushar Gandhi in his petition has sought contempt action against senior police officers for not taking any action on the issue as per the guidelines laid down to prevent cases of hate speeches and lynching. have demanded.

Allegations of spreading hatred in Dharma Sansad The petition states that immediately after the incidents Later the speeches were made available and were also in the public domain. Despite this, Uttarakhand Police and Delhi Police did not take action against those who gave these speeches. It is alleged in this petition that since December 45 at Haridwar till December, and 11 December, held in Delhi ‘Religion Hate speeches were made in the Parliament.