Senior advocates Harish Salve and NK Kaul, representing the faction of Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, opposed sending it to a larger bench. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing on behalf of the Governor of Maharashtra, also opposed it. A five-judge constitution bench had in 2016 ruled in the case of Nabam Rebia of Arunachal Pradesh that if a notice for the removal of the Speaker is already pending in the House, it can act to disqualify MLAs. Cannot process the given request. with language input

You can share this post!

Related News

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Senior advocates Harish Salve and NK Kaul, representing the faction of Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, opposed sending it to a larger bench. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing on behalf of the Governor of Maharashtra, also opposed it. A five-judge constitution bench had in 2016 ruled in the case of Nabam Rebia of Arunachal Pradesh that if a notice for the removal of the Speaker is already pending in the House, it can act to disqualify MLAs. Cannot process the given request.

with language input