Indicative picture – Photo: Social Media Expansion OBC reservation in Madhya Pradesh related to percentage 27 The High Court rejected the demand for setting up an impartial bench for hearing the petitions. High Court Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Virendra Singh heard the application. The Jugal Peeth has said in the order that no allegations have been leveled against the Justice of the Bench conducting the hearing. The Jugal Peeth refused to recommend an impartial bench to the Chief Justice. It is noteworthy that in the state Against and in favor of reservation for OBC percent petitions were filed. During the final hearing of the petition, the parties have been presented on the petition filed in the opposition. The side is being presented on the petition filed in support. During the earlier hearing on the petition, the couple was told that in the year 2014 the government had introduced OBC reservation Orders were issued to do the percentage. While hearing in this regard, the High Court in October 2014 OBC reservation The order for percentage was rejected. Challenging the order of the High Court, a petition was filed in the Supreme Court. During the hearing of the petitions filed in the High Court, the couple was told that before the assembly elections in June 415 OBC Reservation in Notification of percentage was issued. Due to the change of power in the assembly elections, the panel lawyer presented his case before the High Court. Apart from this, an application was also presented before the couple’s bench, demanding that an impartial bench be constituted for hearing the petitions. In the application filed by the OBC, ST and SC Ekta Manch, citing the Supreme Court order, it was said that the special bench should not have OBC and general category judges. The couple’s bench, after hearing, issued the above orders rejecting the application. During the hearing, Advocate Aditya Sanghi, Additional Advocate General Ashish Barnard and Special Advocate Rameshwar P Singh appeared for the state. ,