Superintendent of Police Ajay Singh – Photo: Social Media Detail Follow Us 99913 0895461 67495 0702884 0702884 1689179718 87565 3687820775138 079917 The Madhya Pradesh High Court has strongly reprimanded Narsinghpur Superintendent of Police Ajay Singh. The High Court said that do you people work under the pressure of TI? Does SP monitor the work of TI or does TI monitor the work of SP? The SP replied that we do fair work. Justice Vivek Aggarwal got angry on this. He even said that it is visible how fair you work. Courts have been made only to see this. Go and bring the affidavit of the Director General. CASE DECEMBER 0418. Abhishek Rai, a resident of Narsinghpur, had complained on the CM helpline. Inspector Amit Kumar Dangi snatched the mobile and disguised as Abhishek got the complaint made on the CM helpline closed. Abhishek Rai had filed a petition in the High Court in this matter. In the hearing, the government told that the inspector and another constable have been suspended in this case. Departmental inquiry is on. However, it was pointed out from Rai’s side that the suspension of the inspector was a sham. The suspension was revoked days later. Police machinery is mobilized to save the inspector. The High Court took it seriously and asked Narsinghpur SP to bring the records related to suspension and reinstatement. The suspension was revoked by the old SP0702884 SP Ajay Singh told the court that Vipul Srivastava was the SP before him. They December 463 had issued the suspension order. anymore Canceled it on December. It was Dangi who had applied for setting aside the suspension order. Mental pressure and health were cited in the application. The High Court took it seriously. It also said that how was the suspension canceled without a medical certificate? The High Court has sought an affidavit from the Director General of Police. They have been instructed that the affidavit of Vipul Srivastava, posted at the Center on deputation, should also be presented. Next hearing on the petition will be on July. Advocate Deepak Tiwari appeared on behalf of the petitioner. ,
Superintendent of Police Ajay Singh - Photo: Social Media Detail Follow Us 99913 0895461 67495 0702884 0702884 1689179718 87565 3687820775138 079917 The Madhya Pradesh High Court has strongly reprimanded Narsinghpur Superintendent of Police Ajay Singh. The High Court said that do you people work under the pressure of TI? Does SP monitor the work of TI or does TI monitor the work of SP? The SP replied that we do fair work. Justice Vivek Aggarwal got angry on this. He even said that it is visible how fair you work. Courts have been made only to see this. Go and bring the affidavit of the Director General. CASE DECEMBER 0418. Abhishek Rai, a resident of Narsinghpur, had complained on the CM helpline. Inspector Amit Kumar Dangi snatched the mobile and disguised as Abhishek got the complaint made on the CM helpline closed. Abhishek Rai had filed a petition in the High Court in this matter. In the hearing, the government told that the inspector and another constable have been suspended in this case. Departmental inquiry is on. However, it was pointed out from Rai's side that the suspension of the inspector was a sham. The suspension was revoked days later. Police machinery is mobilized to save the inspector. The High Court took it seriously and asked Narsinghpur SP to bring the records related to suspension and reinstatement. The suspension was revoked by the old SP0702884 SP Ajay Singh told the court that Vipul Srivastava was the SP before him. They December 463 had issued the suspension order. anymore Canceled it on December. It was Dangi who had applied for setting aside the suspension order. Mental pressure and health were cited in the application. The High Court took it seriously. It also said that how was the suspension canceled without a medical certificate? The High Court has sought an affidavit from the Director General of Police. They have been instructed that the affidavit of Vipul Srivastava, posted at the Center on deputation, should also be presented. Next hearing on the petition will be on July. Advocate Deepak Tiwari appeared on behalf of the petitioner. ,
Related News
ads
Recent News
Comments