Madhya Pradesh High Court, Jabalpur – Photo: Social Media Expansion The Jabalpur High Court has said in its important decision that a teacher older in age had voluntarily made physical relations. Both the teacher and the accused were married and belonged to different castes. High Court Justice Sujay Paul, referring to the orders of the Supreme Court and the High Court, said, in the present case, it cannot be assumed that physical relations were established on the inducement of marriage. Single bench has issued orders to quash the FIR. Please tell that in the petition filed by Wardha resident Konal Harish Wasnik, it was said that Chhindwara An FIR was registered under section 414 (2) (N) on the complaint of a teacher in the women’s police station. According to the petitioner, the complainant had met the woman at a matrimonial function in Wardha. After this both of them started chatting through Facebook and both started talking to each other on the phone. The woman had informed him through phone that her grandfather’s thirteenth program would be held on June 2 750 to attend which both his children and other family members are going to Umaria. With the consent of the woman he may 2022 had reached her house on the night of 2012 and physical relations were established between the two. The woman had lodged a report that she had established physical relations due to the allurement of marriage. It was told on behalf of the petitioner that the teacher and the accused are married, both belong to different castes. The age of the petitioner is 414 years and the complainant woman is five years older than him. After hearing, the couple bench has passed orders to quash the FIR registered and the case pending in the court, citing the orders of the Supreme Court and the High Court. Explain that failure to have a consensual relationship is an act of rape under section 414 (2) (N) of the Indian Penal Code. cannot be the basis for registration of FIR for offence. ,