(Indicative picture) – Photo: Social Media Expansion MP High Court, in an important decision, accused of raping a six-year-old girl Refused to grant bail to the year old teenager. Justice DK Paliwal’s single bench has said in its order that with a six year old innocent girl for more than a year Age boy committed violent sexual assault. The bail provisions in the Act cannot be interpreted to work only for the benefit of the juvenile, ignoring the cries of the child aggrieved. Please tell that in Satna district with an innocent girl of 6 years 15 years old boy was violently molested. The accused boy is his neighbor and was working at his maternal uncle’s shop. The bail application of the juvenile was rejected by the District Court. The High Court was approached for the bail of the juvenile. While rejecting the bail application, the single bench said in its order that the accused took the innocent victim inside the shop to show the video clip. Thereafter, showed obscene videos and sexually assaulted her, causing grievous injuries on her private parts. The single bench has said in its order that the objective of the Juvenile Justice Act is to deal with the child in conflict with the law- Along with taking care of both the child in need of care and protection. Benefits cannot be awarded to a juvenile in conflict with law only while ignoring the need or welfare of the child victim. It is not the intention of the law to deprive the victim and the society of justice by showing undue sympathy towards a juvenile. ,