Indicative picture. – Photo: Amar Ujala Expansion Follow Us 99999 94752 96664 93476 1686993546 Madhya Pradesh High Court has said in its important order That judges should not be bloodthirsty. No one should be held guilty because of the nature of the crime. until the allegation is fully proved. No one can be hanged without the charges being proved. High Court Justice Sujay Paul and Justice AK Paliwal have issued orders to set aside the death sentence and other sentences given by the District Court under various sections. The Burhanpur District Court had sent the case to the High Court for confirmation of the death sentence. Besides, Vijay alias Pintaya ( against the death penalty ) has An appeal was filed in the High Court. According to the prosecution, the accused in village Mohda of Burhanpur district august 463 abducted a girl child playing in front of the house. After abducting her, the accused took her to a farm yard and sexually assaulted her. During this, he strangled the girl to death. The dead body of the girl after three days August was found naked on the banks of Chidinya Nallah. The girl’s frock was found at some distance. , During investigation, the police found that the accused had married twice and both the wives had left him. Apart from this, the accused used to molest the minor girl of the village and had also committed unnatural acts with the buffalo. Police arrested the accused and presented the case in the court. After the hearing, the court ordered the accused to be released on March 8 521 was punished with capital punishment under two sections. The court had punished him with imprisonment and fine under other sections. During the hearing, the High Court found that on the basis of PM and DNA reports, the prosecution could not prove that Could there be any sexual harassment with the victim. Apart from this, marks were found on the skull and cheeks of the accused. The nail samples of the girl were not taken before burial. The nail samples were taken after the body was exhumed later with the permission of the SDF. According to the DNA report, no profile was found in the nail of the girl child. The evidence was destroyed due to negligence. Apart from this, the photo of the frock was not even taken. The witnesses have given different evidence regarding the color and print of the frock. The High Court rejected the argument of the prosecution that due to public pressure and anger, the investigation There have been technical errors. The Division Bench of the High Court has said in its order that the prosecution has not been able to fully add the chain of circumstantial evidence in the entire case. With the above order, the Division Bench set aside the order of the District Court. ,