Supreme Court – Photo: Social Media Expansion 100% applicable to the posts of Assistant Grade and Speed ​​Writers 2022 in Madhya Pradesh High Court A challenge has been raised in the Supreme Court against the implementation of communal reservation. While hearing the petition, Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice Bela M Trivedi issued a stay on the order of the double bench of the MP High Court. The Jugalpeeth has issued an order to include meritorious candidates of OBC category in the main examination. of the Preliminary Examination Applied in Result Percentage Communal Reservation 1675492514
In the Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed in the Supreme Court on behalf of petitioner Pushpendra Patel, it has been stated that 30 In the result of the preliminary examination released by the High Court on March 233 percent communal reservation has been implemented. Meritorious candidates of reserved category are not selected in unreserved category. Against this he filed a petition in the High Court. The High Court’s double bench had reserved the decision on August 3 after the hearing. The said petition was dismissed by the Jugal Peeth on January 2. The High Court’s Jugalpeeth has said in its order that the preliminary examination was conducted in the form of a screening test in the advertisement. Is. Screening Test was conducted to shortlist the candidates. That’s why reservation doesn’t apply in that. While upholding the process of the High Court, the Jugal Peeth has said in its order that the reservation system is applicable in the selection process. told the result Gone Article 14 and 16 Breach of

filed in the Supreme Court It has been said in the SLP that the High Court has unconstitutionally invoked Section 4(4) of the Reservation Act 2022 in the said recruitment process. Result has been made against And 14 is a flagrant violation. Which in the case of Indra Shahani v. Union of India on behalf of the nine judge bench of the Supreme Court It is clearly stated that in the unreserved category only meritorious irrespective of the category will be selected and the said process will be implemented at each stage of the examination. From Madhya Pradesh High Court also on 7th April has been clearly arranged in matters related to PSC examination that unreserved category is born only from meritorious candidates. This is in violation of the judgments of the Supreme Court in Indra Shahani v. Union of India, Saurabh Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh, Rajesh Kumar Daria. Hanuman in Jat Gujarat HC had also issued a similar order in the matter
2022 Petitioner’s advocate Rameshwar Singh Thakur said that during the hearing of the SLP, Justice Ajay Rastogi of the Supreme Court remarked Having said that as the Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court, I had also issued a similar order in the Hanuman Jat case. The Supreme Court had passed a stay order on that. After hearing, the couple’s bench issued the above orders. ,