Madhya Pradesh High Court (File Photo) – Photo : Amar Ujala

Expansion Former Judge of Jabalpur High Court SS Jha, his advocate son KS Jha Half-a-dozen petitions, including those filed by former Supreme Court Justice PP Navlekar and former Advocate General A Agarwal, have challenged the forcible acquisition of land for the flyover. It has been said in the petition, flyover is being constructed inside the city by the Municipal Corporation. Where the flyover is being lowered in Pandit Lajja Shankar Marg, the width of the road has been fixed as more than feet, Which is more than the master plan. For this, personal land of the people is being acquired. Apart from this, people’s land is also being forcibly acquired from Damoh Naka to Madan Mahal road. The next hearing on the petition has been fixed after a week. In the past, while hearing the petition, the High Court had issued orders to appoint an arbitrator for mutual agreement. The report submitted by the Arbitrator said that 100% compensation should be given for the building. 100% compensation should be given for leased land and freehold land. The government objected to the report of the arbitrator and argued that the road has been assessed as per the revenue records. During the earlier hearing, the Jugalpeeth has directed the government to start the demarcation process and get its videography done. Along with this, the government should deposit ten crore rupees in the court as security fund. Orders were also issued to provide prescribed interim compensation on behalf of the government, keeping the prescribed couple compensation subject to the final order of the petition. During the last hearing, the couple was told that the buildings were being demolished without giving interim compensation, on which the couple had sought an answer from the government. During the last hearing, the Advocate General told the Bench that the amount of interim compensation would be deposited in the bank account of the concerned persons. During the hearing on the petition on Wednesday, it was told that the amount has not been deposited in the bank accounts, on which the couple expressed displeasure and issued orders. Advocate Aditya Sanghi and Advocate Anshuman Singh appeared on behalf of the petitioners. ,