Follow for latest updates

The petition said that the bank guarantee is fake He was not aware of this. The bank guarantee was prepared by Narayan Tripathi, which he had deposited believing it to be genuine. The Collector canceled his license without giving him an opportunity of hearing. Madhya Pradesh High Court – Photo: Amar Ujala

Details 1636378574 Submission of Fake Bank Guarantee Canceling the license of the liquor shop, the Collector had issued orders to invite new tenders. On this, the liquor contractor company had filed a petition in the High Court. High Court Justice GS Ahluwalia and Justice AK Singh upheld the Collector’s order and dismissed the petition.

Tell that in the petition filed on behalf of Rathore & Mehta Associates, it was said that there are three partners in their firm. Sanjeev Kumar Mehta and Surendra Rathore have 31 percent participation in the firm and Sushil Singh has ten percent participation. Sanjeev Kumar had given 11 percent participation to Anand Tripathi from his share. Anand Tripathi’s father Narayan Tripathi had given him a bank guarantee from Union Bank Siliguri for the license of Lalghati liquor shop in Bhopal. The above bank guarantee was deposited by him in the Excise Department. On checking the bank guarantee, it was found to be fake, regarding which a report was lodged at Kohefija police station.

to the Collector, Bhopal, the bank has 11 e- The bank guarantee was reported to be fake through mail. The collector canceled his license on the same day and invited e-tender again on the next day 31 May. Issued orders to do so. It was said in the petition that the bank guarantee is fake, he was not aware of it. The bank guarantee was prepared by Narayan Tripathi, which he had deposited believing it to be genuine. The Collector canceled his license without giving him an opportunity of hearing. The Jugalpeeth has said in its order that the license was obtained by forgery, hence the section of the Excise Act Opportunity of hearing cannot be provided under s. The Jugal Peeth dismissed the petition justifying the order of the Collector. ,