mp-hc:-order-to-open-choice-filling-portal-for-teachers-of-tribal-department,-ban-on-declaration-of-results
Expansion Madhya Pradesh High Court, by its interim order, has directed to open choice filling portal in School Education Department for secondary teachers of Tribal Department. The single bench of Justice Vivek Aggarwal has said in its order that the result should not be released till the final disposal of the petition. These cases were filed on behalf of 2019 people, including Aarti Singh and Kuldeep Parashar, secondary teachers posted in different districts of the state. have been done. It has been said in these that the recruitment of teachers in the state is going on since last October . Separate counseling was done by DPI and Tribal Department instead of joint counseling by Vyapam in the eligibility test . Due to this one candidate got selected at different places. The department which issued the appointment letter earlier, he joined that department. After that the selection list was released by DPI. According to the selection list, many teachers want to be posted in the schools near their residence, because the schools of the Tribal Department run only in the notified areas and the teachers are from one department. Secondly, there is no rule of transfer from Public Education Department to Tribal. That's why teachers working in Tribal Department are seeking posting of their choice in schools run by DPI. It has been denied by the School Education Department from the selection of schools saying that the concerned teacher (petitioner) is already appointed. Whereas before this, DPI and Tribal Department have given opportunity to the teachers by depositing one month's salary. On this, these petitions have been filed challenging the said order of DPI. It was argued on behalf of the petitioners that Articles 19 of the Constitution, 16, 19 And Under this, they have this fundamental right that where and in which department they have to work. In the past, other candidates have been given a chance by paying one month's salary. Therefore, the petitioners cannot be discriminated against on the ground of equality. After the hearing, the court said the interim Gave orders. Advocate Rameshwar Singh Thakur appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Reply sought from High Court Advocate Bar Madhya Pradesh High Court's Chief Justice Ravi Vijay Malimath and Justice Vishal Mishra's double bench on the petition pending since the year 2019 High Court Advocate Bar has been directed to file reply. This petition has been filed on behalf of Advocate Amit Patel. It is alleged that despite the above bar not being recognized by the State Bar Council illegally, a big hall was allotted by the High Court in front of the copy section. The relief to evacuate him has been sought in the case. It is alleged in the petition that the said Bar does not follow the Supreme Court's judicial principle of 'One Vote One Bar'. Not only this, the High Court Bar Association which is a recognized association. Creates class war among its members, which is wrong. Advocate Satish Verma, on behalf of the petitioner, said that the outstanding electricity bill of the said illegal bar has reached close to one crore. Which is public and government's money. But under an interim order, the power company is being prevented from recovering the dues for years. Whenever the said case is filed, the members of the organization stand together and get the case escalated, which is wrong. On this the court said that such cases will not be extended now. The court ordered all the cases to be heard together and ordered to present answers in all. It will be heard after four weeks. Satish Verma appeared on behalf of the petitioner, BN Shukla appeared on behalf of the High Court and Senior Advocate Anil Khare, Senior Advocate Sanjay Aggarwal and Advocate Praveen Dubey appeared on behalf of Advocate Bar. ,

You can share this post!

Related News

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Expansion Madhya Pradesh High Court, by its interim order, has directed to open choice filling portal in School Education Department for secondary teachers of Tribal Department. The single bench of Justice Vivek Aggarwal has said in its order that the result should not be released till the final disposal of the petition.

These cases were filed on behalf of 2019 people, including Aarti Singh and Kuldeep Parashar, secondary teachers posted in different districts of the state. have been done. It has been said in these that the recruitment of teachers in the state is going on since last October . Separate counseling was done by DPI and Tribal Department instead of joint counseling by Vyapam in the eligibility test . Due to this one candidate got selected at different places. The department which issued the appointment letter earlier, he joined that department. After that the selection list was released by DPI.

According to the selection list, many teachers want to be posted in the schools near their residence, because the schools of the Tribal Department run only in the notified areas and the teachers are from one department. Secondly, there is no rule of transfer from Public Education Department to Tribal. That’s why teachers working in Tribal Department are seeking posting of their choice in schools run by DPI.

It has been denied by the School Education Department from the selection of schools saying that the concerned teacher (petitioner) is already appointed. Whereas before this, DPI and Tribal Department have given opportunity to the teachers by depositing one month’s salary. On this, these petitions have been filed challenging the said order of DPI.

It was argued on behalf of the petitioners that Articles 19 of the Constitution, 16, 19 And Under this, they have this fundamental right that where and in which department they have to work. In the past, other candidates have been given a chance by paying one month’s salary. Therefore, the petitioners cannot be discriminated against on the ground of equality. After the hearing, the court said the interim Gave orders. Advocate Rameshwar Singh Thakur appeared on behalf of the petitioners.

Reply sought from High Court Advocate Bar

Madhya Pradesh High Court’s Chief Justice Ravi Vijay Malimath and Justice Vishal Mishra’s double bench on the petition pending since the year 2019 High Court Advocate Bar has been directed to file reply. This petition has been filed on behalf of Advocate Amit Patel. It is alleged that despite the above bar not being recognized by the State Bar Council

illegally, a big hall was allotted by the High Court in front of the copy section. The relief to evacuate him has been sought in the case. It is alleged in the petition that the said Bar does not follow the Supreme Court’s judicial principle of ‘One Vote One Bar’. Not only this, the High Court Bar Association which is a recognized association. Creates class war among its members, which is wrong.

Advocate Satish Verma, on behalf of the petitioner, said that the outstanding electricity bill of the said illegal bar has reached close to one crore. Which is public and government’s money. But under an interim order, the power company is being prevented from recovering the dues for years. Whenever the said case is filed, the members of the organization stand together and get the case escalated, which is wrong.

On this the court said that such cases will not be extended now. The court ordered all the cases to be heard together and ordered to present answers in all. It will be heard after four weeks. Satish Verma appeared on behalf of the petitioner, BN Shukla appeared on behalf of the High Court and Senior Advocate Anil Khare, Senior Advocate Sanjay Aggarwal and Advocate Praveen Dubey appeared on behalf of Advocate Bar. ,

Posted in MP