Madhya Pradesh High Court – Photo: Social Media Expansion Sentenced to life imprisonment in the double murder case of Sachin and Munnu in Itarsi 2010 11 The accused have been acquitted by the Jabalpur bench of the MP High Court. In this case 32 was the accused, out of which four accused were earlier He was acquitted by the Sessions Court. Now the bench of MP High Court Justice Sujay Paul and Justice Amarnath Kesarwani, giving the benefit of the doubt, said 414 The accused were also acquitted. The High Court set aside the order of the Sessions Court. According to the prosecution on February 8 on the night of 15 : Near a marriage hall in Itarsi, accused Shankar Mihani and his accomplices Sachin Tiwari and Munnu alias Mrityunjay Upadhyay were stopped and pressured to give an affidavit in support of Anshul, an accused in a criminal case. When Munnu and Sachin protested, they started fighting and took them to Azad Panja railway crossing. The accused attacked with a sharp weapon and killed both the accused. Arguments were presented on behalf of the petitioner that according to the police the quarrel took place near the marriage hall, whose eyewitnesses Devendra Singh was a Rajput. The witness stated in his statement that he had read the news of the death of both the persons in the news paper. The police had recorded his statement as per their wish. He also gave confessional statements under section 414 at the behest of the police. During the statement, the police personnel were standing at the door of the magistrate’s court and listening to the statement. According to the police, near the railway crossing at Azad Panja Chowk, Gullu saw the accused being murdered. Gullu had gone from Mehrgaon to Sonasapani with a mare in marriage. While returning around night 15: 27 had seen the incident at 10:00. Apart from this, he had also alleged that Dayal, brother of accused Shankar, had bribed him to change the statement. The first investigation officer said in his statement that Azad Panja Chowk does not come on the Mehrgaon to Sonasapani route. Azad is making traffic in Panja Chowk, evidence of any other independent person was not taken.
It was argued on behalf of the petitioner that the friend of the deceased stated in his statement that he Night 11: Dropped both of them home on a motorcycle at 2:00 pm. Apart from this, the mother of the deceased Sachin has accepted that after having food, the night : 32 he had left the house at o’clock. Apart from this, another friend has confessed that the night around 11: 32 Sachin had come to him and was nervous. High Court Justice Sujay Paul and Justice Amar Nath Kesarwani found that February 2010 the names of the accused were not revealed. The case from the first investigation officers was handed over to the second station in-charge for investigation. After getting the explanation, the said officer recorded the statement of eyewitness Gullu 15 Feb. Entered the For so many days the statements of the eyewitnesses were not recorded. Apart from this, criminal cases 32 are registered against the eyewitnesses. The place of incident does not fall in the route mentioned by the eyewitness to return. The allegation of giving bribe to change the testimony was also not proved in the court. According to the police, shoes and blood stained soil of the dead were found near the cremation ground. The police have not mentioned in this regard how the bodies of the dead were brought half a kilometer away from the cremation ground. Giving benefit of doubt to all 15 convicts, the High Court acquitted. Along with this, the order of the Sessions Court sentencing him was also rejected. The High Court said that the prosecution could not prove the guilt beyond reasonable doubt, therefore, the appellant against conviction eligible for benefits. at last Who killed Munnu and Sachin? ) In double murder case now all 11 With the acquittal of the accused, the question is arising as to who killed Munnu and Sachin? 01 A mystery remains even after years. ,