Follow for latest updates

in case of murder of mother by Anuppur district court An appeal was filed in the High Court against the sentence of life imprisonment to the son. In this, the High Court observed that the District Court relied on the story of the prosecution mechanically presented by the District Court without examining the material aspects. The High Court has canceled the remaining imprisonment. Madhya Pradesh High Court – Photo: Amar Ujala

Detail Murder of mother The son sentenced to life imprisonment in the case has got relief from the High Court. A division bench of High Court Justice Sujay Paul and Justice AK Paliwal observed that the district court has relied on the mechanically presented story of the prosecution without examining the material aspects. The Jugal Peeth has issued orders to cancel the remaining sentence of the accused.

An appeal was filed in the High Court by the petitioner Sudama Singh Rathore against the Anuppur District Court awarding him life imprisonment for the murder of his mother. In the appeal filed on behalf of the petitioner, it was said that his mother Munni Bai resident of village Bhilmat police station Jaithari should be murdered in September Went. He was opposing the Moser Mayer company, so the police had a grudge against him. That is why he has been falsely implicated. That 233 September From to 233 April 2021 was in judicial custody till . District Court Anuppur him 233 November was convicted, since then he is in jail.

It was argued on behalf of the appellant that as per the FSL report the hair found in the hand of the deceased belonged to him. While photographs of the deceased and the scene of the incident were taken, they were not produced before the court. Not only this, the police personnel in whose presence the hair sample of the appellant was taken did not appear before the Court to testify. The District Court has punished him with punishment only on the basis of FSL report. The Division Bench has observed in its order that there is considerable doubt as to whether the hair of the appellant was found in the hand of the deceased or not. The District Court, without examining the material aspects, relied on the mechanically advanced story of the prosecution and convicted the appellant. The High Court has issued orders setting aside the remaining sentence of the appellant. Advocate Anjana Kuraria appeared on behalf of the appellant. ,