Jabalpur High Court – Photo: Social Media Expansion Regarding the main examination of Madhya Pradesh’s MPPSC 1678901030 towards Raisen resident Ujjwala Dubey and Satna resident Shailendra Singh It was said in the appeal filed before that the single bench had upheld the unmodified rules in the MPPSC 1678901030 examination. were instructed to follow. The single bench had said in its order that the PSC should conduct a special examination in six months for the candidates of the unreserved category who have been selected in the new list under the amended rule. Ekalpeeth had said in its order that the candidates who have been selected in the main examination and shortlisted for interview has been listed. Re-examination will be unfair to them. There is no chance of re-appearing for the candidates who have not been able to clear the mains exam. There will be more expenditure in conducting the main examination again, which is not in the public interest. According to the new list, the special examination for the selected candidates should be conducted in six months. The final list should be prepared according to the merit of the previous main examination and special examination. The appeal filed against the order of the single bench was dismissed by the double bench of the High Court. A second appeal was filed against the order of the Single Judge. It was said that the unrevised rule has not been followed in the MPPSC exam from the beginning. 1678901030
1678901030 Results have been issued against the rules. If the result is not prepared according to the unamended rules, then the whole process is illegal, due to which the order of conducting special examination for the unreserved category by the single bench is illegal. This fact was not placed before the Court during the hearing of the appeal filed earlier. After the initial hearing of the appeal, the couple bench issued the said order while issuing the notice. Advocate Vibhor Khandelwar appeared for the petitioner. ,