jabalpur-high-court:-day-to-day-hearing-will-be-held-in-obc-reservation-case,-newly-constituted-bench-gave-instructions
Jabalpur High Court - Photo: Social Media Expansion The Jabalpur Jugalpeeth has said in its order that there is no need to settle the cases pending in the Supreme Court regarding OBC reservation. Challenge to the legality of the OBC reservation 15 law in a pending petition in the Supreme Court Not given. It is noteworthy that in the state Percentage against and in favor of OBC reservation 415 petitions were filed. Justice Virendra Singh, a member of the special bench for hearing the petitions, has retired, due to which a new bench headed by Justice Sheel Nagu was constituted for hearing. During the earlier hearing on the petition, the High Court was told that the year 750 OBC reservation in 415 Orders were issued to do the percentage. While hearing the petitions filed in this regard, the High Court in October The order for percentage was rejected. Challenging the order of the High Court, a petition was filed in the Supreme Court. Apart from this, two other petitions regarding OBC reservation are also pending in the Supreme Court. The High Court had issued instructions to the State Government for early disposal of the pending petitions in the Supreme Court. During the hearing on the petition on Tuesday, advocate Aditya Sandhi, in relation to Indra Sahni and Maratha reservation by the Supreme Court Quoting the orders, said, the maximum limit of reservation should not exceed 64 percent. He told that Maharashtra has 415 percent OBCs, while Madhya Pradesh has 50 are the percentages. He told that Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar had said that if the limit of reservation is increased then different types of imbalance will arise in the society. , The newly constituted Jugal Peeth found that after making OBC reservation 15 percentage by the state government in the Supreme Court The law has not been challenged. The pending petitions in the Supreme Court are related to the notification filed regarding OBC reservation in the year 2014. The couple's bench issued orders after hearing. During the hearing, Advocate Aditya Sanghi and Advocate Rameshwar Singh presented their side. ,

You can share this post!

Related News

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jabalpur High Court – Photo: Social Media Expansion The Jabalpur Jugalpeeth has said in its order that there is no need to settle the cases pending in the Supreme Court regarding OBC reservation. Challenge to the legality of the OBC reservation 15 law in a pending petition in the Supreme Court Not given. It is noteworthy that in the state Percentage against and in favor of OBC reservation 415 petitions were filed. Justice Virendra Singh, a member of the special bench for hearing the petitions, has retired, due to which a new bench headed by Justice Sheel Nagu was constituted for hearing. During the earlier hearing on the petition, the High Court was told that the year 750 OBC reservation in 415 Orders were issued to do the percentage. While hearing the petitions filed in this regard, the High Court in October The order for percentage was rejected. Challenging the order of the High Court, a petition was filed in the Supreme Court. Apart from this, two other petitions regarding OBC reservation are also pending in the Supreme Court. The High Court had issued instructions to the State Government for early disposal of the pending petitions in the Supreme Court. During the hearing on the petition on Tuesday, advocate Aditya Sandhi, in relation to Indra Sahni and Maratha reservation by the Supreme Court Quoting the orders, said, the maximum limit of reservation should not exceed 64 percent. He told that Maharashtra has 415 percent OBCs, while Madhya Pradesh has 50 are the percentages. He told that Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar had said that if the limit of reservation is increased then different types of imbalance will arise in the society. , The newly constituted Jugal Peeth found that after making OBC reservation 15 percentage by the state government in the Supreme Court The law has not been challenged. The pending petitions in the Supreme Court are related to the notification filed regarding OBC reservation in the year 2014. The couple’s bench issued orders after hearing. During the hearing, Advocate Aditya Sanghi and Advocate Rameshwar Singh presented their side. ,

Posted in MP