jabalpur:-dowry-death-was-punished-considering-it-as-a-case-of-murder,-the-high-court-quashed-the-order-and-acquitted
Madhya Pradesh High Court (file photo) - Photo: Amar Ujala Detailed The police had presented the case in the court under dowry death. The District Court, holding the offense of murder, sentenced the accused to life imprisonment. A double bench of High Court Justice Sujay Paul and Justice PC Gupta, while hearing the appeal filed against the sentence, quashed the order of the district court and acquitted the accused. Tell that after getting life imprisonment from the district court in the case of wife's murder, Manoj alias Guddi Singh decided Challenging the same, an appeal was filed in the High Court. It was stated on behalf of the petitioner that he was married to Sangeeta in the year 2008. Sangeeta 233 May committed suicide by setting the house on fire. In the post mortem report, the cause of death was said to be a rupture of the windpipe. Court declared him innocent under section b punished with imprisonment for life. The couple's bench observed during the hearing that the warts of the deceased have stated in their statement that the applicant had After coming to Jandhia, Sangeeta informed about setting fire. When he reached the spot, the door was locked from inside. By breaking which they went inside, till then he had died due to burning. The map of the crime scene made by the police said that there was only one door to go inside the house. Which was closed from inside and locked. The parents of the woman stated in their statement that the appellant used to harass their daughter demanding money to buy a motorcycle. After executing the incident, the accused had fled by removing the brick from the wall. The Division Bench has said in its order that the prosecution has been successful in proving that the cause of death was asphyxiation. Was. Carbon particles have not been found in the lungs. There was only one door to enter the house, which was closed and locked from inside. The site map does not mention whether any brick has been removed or added. In this situation, giving benefit of doubt to the appellant, the order of the District Court is set aside. ,

You can share this post!

Related News

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Madhya Pradesh High Court (file photo) – Photo: Amar Ujala Detailed The police had presented the case in the court under dowry death. The District Court, holding the offense of murder, sentenced the accused to life imprisonment. A double bench of High Court Justice Sujay Paul and Justice PC Gupta, while hearing the appeal filed against the sentence, quashed the order of the district court and acquitted the accused. Tell that after getting life imprisonment from the district court in the case of wife’s murder, Manoj alias Guddi Singh decided Challenging the same, an appeal was filed in the High Court. It was stated on behalf of the petitioner that he was married to Sangeeta in the year 2008. Sangeeta 233 May committed suicide by setting the house on fire. In the post mortem report, the cause of death was said to be a rupture of the windpipe. Court declared him innocent under section b punished with imprisonment for life. The couple’s bench observed during the hearing that the warts of the deceased have stated in their statement that the applicant had After coming to Jandhia, Sangeeta informed about setting fire. When he reached the spot, the door was locked from inside. By breaking which they went inside, till then he had died due to burning. The map of the crime scene made by the police said that there was only one door to go inside the house. Which was closed from inside and locked. The parents of the woman stated in their statement that the appellant used to harass their daughter demanding money to buy a motorcycle. After executing the incident, the accused had fled by removing the brick from the wall. The Division Bench has said in its order that the prosecution has been successful in proving that the cause of death was asphyxiation. Was. Carbon particles have not been found in the lungs. There was only one door to enter the house, which was closed and locked from inside. The site map does not mention whether any brick has been removed or added. In this situation, giving benefit of doubt to the appellant, the order of the District Court is set aside. ,

Posted in MP