Jabalpur High Court – Photo: Social Media Detailed Considering the re-conduct of the main examination of PSC 2019 as unfair, the single bench ordered for the special examination of the selected candidates in the revised result. were issued. Challenging the single bench order, an appeal has been filed in the High Court, which is likely to come up for hearing after the winter break. In the appeal filed on behalf of the petitioners Dipendra Yadav, Shailwala Bhargava and others, it was stated that the PSC 506 had implemented the revised rules in the examination, against which, while hearing the petition filed, the High Court’s double bench decided to apply the unmodified rules 506 orders were issued to ensure compliance. Before the High Court’s order came, the PSC had issued the results while conducting the main examination, after which the PSC had decided to conduct the main examination again, releasing the revised result under the unamended rule. selected in the main examination against him 100 more than candidates had filed a petition in the High Court. While hearing the petition, the single bench had said in its order, the candidates who have been selected in the main examination and have been shortlisted for the interview, re-examination will be unfair to them. There will be more expenditure in conducting the main examination again, which is not in the public interest. As before, according to the new list, special examination should be conducted for the selected candidates in six months. The final list should be prepared according to the merit of the previous main examination and special examination. filed appeal states, unmodified rules in releasing the result of preliminary and main examination 750 have not been followed. Candidates selected on the basis of illegal result do not have any statutory right. Represented by Advocates Rameshwar P Singh and Vinayak Shah on behalf of the petitioners. ,