Madhya Pradesh High Court, Jabalpur – Photo: Social Media Expansion Jabalpur High Court has said in its important decision that a person living abroad can take a Godnama. Public notice is not necessary for the adoption of a child after the issue of a legally emancipated certificate. High Court Justice Sujay Paul, setting aside the decision of the lower court, has issued instructions to the US resident couple to adopt the child. Tell that on behalf of Matri Chhaya Infant Home located in Satna and US resident Pushkar Srikar Rao and his wife Shreya Satyendra Challenging the decision of the lower court, a revision petition was filed in the High Court. It was said in the petition that he had applied under the legal process to adopt a girl child living in Matri Chaya Shishu Griha. The permission of the court is necessary at the last stage of the legal process. The court rejected his application on 30 July. It was said in the revision petition that section of the Juvenile Justice Act-08 The court has said in its order that if no Indian is found despite all efforts, then the resident abroad can adopt the child. The child is not free for adoption internationally. It was argued on behalf of the petitioner that the Hague Convention was held for the protection of the child and its adoption at the international level. , in which India and America had also signed. After that, India had formed the Central Adoption Resource Authority for international adoption, which is a statutory body. After the name of the child was registered in the portal of Kara, the US resident applied for the adoption of the couple. CARA, US and other agencies are providing NOC for the charter. Ekalpeeth after hearing found that the girl child was born on May 1 happened on. Seven days after the birth, the parents had voluntarily left the girl child in the children’s home. Thereafter, he did not submit his claim on the child for days, after which the name of the child was registered in the portal. Hua and the couple living abroad applied. It is not in the best interest and welfare of the girl child to be given for inter-country adoption. This determination is wrong. The single bench set aside the order of the lower court and allowed the adoption of the child. ,