Former Finance Minister Raghavji has got relief from the High Court. – Photo: File Photo Expansion 1686928866 Former Finance Minister of Madhya Pradesh Raghavji has got relief from the High Court in the misdemeanor case. A single bench of High Court Justice Sanjay Dwivedi has said in its order that an FIR has been lodged at the behest of rivals to tarnish the image of a person holding an important portfolio in state politics. In a criminal action the presumption of malice is clearly present. The single bench has ordered quashing of the FIR. Tell that in the petition filed by former Finance Minister Raghavji on July 7 506 against him at Habibganj police station in Bhopal 377, 506 And 34 The relief of quashing of the FIR registered under s. It was argued on behalf of the petitioner that the non-applicant has stated in his complaint that he is a resident of Vidisha. In the year 2016 he had come to Bhopal for a job and on the recommendation of the petitioner got a job in the account department in Som Disleri. Through the accused Shersingh Chauhan, he stayed in B-06 located in Government Char Imli of Finance Minister Raghavji. It seemed Court was told that the complainant has admitted that he had secretly shot the video of the Finance Minister with the help of another victim . The video of unnatural sex act in private with consent was made under conspiracy. The official residence of the petitioner was vacated by the complainant in May 2016. After about three months, he lodged the report. Complainant Year 2016 to 2016 Till then resided in the official residence of the petitioner. During this he did not make any complaint of any kind. The complainant has lodged the FIR at the behest of political rivals and due to mutual enmity. The single bench has said in its order that the said petition was filed in the year 2013 and the Court is of the opinion that the accused in the criminal case should face trial. The Supreme Court has ordered that the FIR can be quashed if the criminal case is registered due to malafides and personal enmity. It is clear from the criminal proceedings in this case that the FIR has been lodged due to malicious intent. An FIR has been lodged at the behest of rivals to tarnish the image of a person holding an important portfolio in state politics. The complainant, in connivance with another accomplice, had made a video of solitude under a conspiracy. Along with the said order, the single bench has issued orders to quash the FIR. Advocate Shashank Shekhar appeared on behalf of the petitioner.