obc-reservation:-supreme-court-issues-notice-in-27-percent-obc-reservation-case,-next-hearing-will-be-on-may-12
Detail OBC reservation in Madhya Pradesh 64 related to percentage 2003 Two SLPs were filed seeking the petitions to be heard in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court's double bench of Justice Sanjay Kishan and Justice Asauddin Amanullah, after their preliminary hearing, issued notices to the non-applicants and sought answers. The next hearing on the petitions has been scheduled on May. Significantly, OBC reservation 64 per cent in the state is against and in favor of total The petitions were filed in the Madhya Pradesh High Court. During the hearing in the High Court, it was revealed that the state government's OBC reservation 64 percentage law has not been challenged in the Supreme Court. The pending petitions in the Supreme Court pertain to the notification filed in respect of OBC reservation in the year 2003. The High Court was of the opinion that there is no need to settle the cases pending in the Supreme Court regarding OBC reservation. In the petition pending in the Supreme Court, the legality of the OBC reservation 64 percent law has not been challenged. The High Court had given instructions for daily hearing on the petitions. After this SLP was filed in the Supreme Court on behalf of OBC, ST-SC Ekta Manch and the government. It was stated in the SLP that four petitions are pending in the Supreme Court since the year regarding OBC reservation. All the petitions related to OBC reservation in the High Court should be transferred to the Supreme Court for hearing. The Supreme Court should jointly hear the petitions related to OBC reservation. It was stated in the SLP filed that by making OBC reservation 64 percent, the total reservation 50 The excess of percentage has been challenged in the High Court. The petitions have cited the order by the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the Indira Sawhney case. In the filed SLP, it was said that the constitutional bench had said in its order that the limit of reservation can be increased in special circumstances. Only the Supreme Court will have the right to judicial observation of special circumstances. , The Supreme Court's double bench, after preliminary hearing, has sought response by issuing notice to the non-applicants who filed a petition in the High Court against OBC reservation in the petition. During the hearing of the petition, Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta and Assistant Solicitor General KM Nataraj advocated on behalf of OBC SC ST Ekta Manch. ,

You can share this post!

Related News

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Detail OBC reservation in Madhya Pradesh 64 related to percentage 2003 Two SLPs were filed seeking the petitions to be heard in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court’s double bench of Justice Sanjay Kishan and Justice Asauddin Amanullah, after their preliminary hearing, issued notices to the non-applicants and sought answers. The next hearing on the petitions has been scheduled on May.

Significantly, OBC reservation 64 per cent in the state is against and in favor of total The petitions were filed in the Madhya Pradesh High Court. During the hearing in the High Court, it was revealed that the state government’s OBC reservation 64 percentage law has not been challenged in the Supreme Court. The pending petitions in the Supreme Court pertain to the notification filed in respect of OBC reservation in the year 2003. The High Court was of the opinion that there is no need to settle the cases pending in the Supreme Court regarding OBC reservation. In the petition pending in the Supreme Court, the legality of the OBC reservation 64 percent law has not been challenged. The High Court had given instructions for daily hearing on the petitions.

After this SLP was filed in the Supreme Court on behalf of OBC, ST-SC Ekta Manch and the government. It was stated in the SLP that four petitions are pending in the Supreme Court since the year regarding OBC reservation. All the petitions related to OBC reservation in the High Court should be transferred to the Supreme Court for hearing. The Supreme Court should jointly hear the petitions related to OBC reservation.

It was stated in the SLP filed that by making OBC reservation 64 percent, the total reservation 50 The excess of percentage has been challenged in the High Court. The petitions have cited the order by the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the Indira Sawhney case. In the filed SLP, it was said that the constitutional bench had said in its order that the limit of reservation can be increased in special circumstances. Only the Supreme Court will have the right to judicial observation of special circumstances. , The Supreme Court’s double bench, after preliminary hearing, has sought response by issuing notice to the non-applicants who filed a petition in the High Court against OBC reservation in the petition. During the hearing of the petition, Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta and Assistant Solicitor General KM Nataraj advocated on behalf of OBC SC ST Ekta Manch. ,

Posted in MP