Madhya Pradesh High Court, Jabalpur – Photo: Social Media Expansion 2023 Instead of retiring, got the work done for two years. After this recovery order of percent salary was issued. Against which the aggrieved employee filed a petition in the High Court and kept his side. High Court Justice Vivek Aggarwal has set aside the recovery order and imposed a cost of Rs 10,000 on the PWD department. Single bench has issued instructions to provide the amount of cost to the petitioner. In the petition filed on behalf of Shivcharitra Tiwari, a direct resident, it was said that he was working in the Public Works Department. Worked as a timekeeper. Due to the mistake of the department, he was replaced by 2013 was retired. Subsequently 50 September 2023 Chief Engineer (National Highway Zone) Bhopal has given two years additional pay to the employee 414 issued the order to deduct per cent. After hearing the petition, the single bench said in its order that when the petitioner worked for two years If done, recovery cannot be done from it. It is the fault of the departmental officers for not retiring the employee on time. Rejecting the recovery order, the single bench imposed a cost of Rs 10,000 on the PWD department and said that this amount should also have been recovered from the erring officers. During the hearing of the petition, the petitioner presented his own case. ,