Madhya Pradesh High Court (file photo) – Photo: Amar Ujala Expansion Madhya Pradesh High Court has said in its important order that the misuse of Section-311 Should not be done pending conclusion. The court should use it when there is a solid and valid reason. High Court Justice Rajendra Kumar Verma, along with the order, dismissed the petition in question, along with the demand for summoning the witnesses for re-examination. In the petition filed on behalf of the petitioner Pramod Kolh, it was stated that the section against him-, is pending in the Court. He filed an application in the court under section-311 seeking to call the three witnesses in the case for re-examination. did. His application was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, Padhurna, District Chhindwara, due to which the petition has been filed. Opposing the petition on behalf of the government, it was said that an application has been filed for delay in the trial. The Single Bench observed during the hearing that the petitioner had filed an application for re-examination of three witnesses, out of which One witness was examined and cross-examined five years ago and the other four years ago. The single bench said in its order, under section-311 the court can summon any person. Applying late is one important reason. It should be used with caution for sound and valid reasons. The Single Judge dismissed the application with the order. ,