Summary

Follow for latest updates

According to the contempt petition, Divisional Commissioner Sagar Apprised of the order, the application was presented on 20 December for expedited hearing. But the Divisional Commissioner did not settle the matter. After this, the single bench, taking serious note of the disobedience of the order of the High Court, issued a show cause notice to the Divisional Commissioner Sagar and sought his reply. Expansion Madhya Pradesh High Court on Tuesday issued show cause notice to Sagar Commissioner Manoj Kumar Shukla regarding contempt petition Have done Despite the order of the court, Sagar Commissioner Shukla did not dispose of the appeal within the prescribed time limit. A contempt petition was filed against this in the High Court. High Court Justice MS Bhatti has issued a show cause notice to Commissioner Sagar seeking his reply.

District Collector Chhatarpur had taken action on the old records In the petition filed on behalf of the petitioner Kallu Lodhi, it was stated that on the basis of criminal record, Collector Chhatarpur had had taken district change action against him. District Collector Chhatarpur took action to change the district on the basis of previous criminal records in the year September . During this he did not do any criminal activity. He had filed an appeal before Divisional Commissioner Sagar Mukesh Kumar Shukla against the action of district change.

The court ordered disposal of the appeal days Divisional Commissioner kept pending without hearing his appeal . Against this, Lodhi had filed the said petition in the High Court. It was said in the petition that the order of Chhatarpur Collector is a violation of the section of the Constitution. While hearing the petition, the single bench had issued an order to the Divisional Commissioner Sagar to dispose of the appeal in days.

Sagar commissioner ignored the court’s order
It was said in the contempt petition filed that the Divisional Commissioner Sagar was informed about the order of the High Court for an expedited hearing 26 Application was also submitted on December . Despite this, the Divisional Commissioner did not resolve the matter. Taking serious note of the disobedience of the order of the High Court, the single bench issued a show cause notice to the Divisional Commissioner Sagar and sought his reply. Advocate Rameshwar Singh Thakur appeared on behalf of the petitioner. ,